Comparative Perspectives on the Missing Link: Communicative Pragmatics
نویسندگان
چکیده
A common assumption is that communicative competence simply fl ows from some possibly innate by-product of vocal development. Understanding the dimensions of competence, or what in this chapter is called “communicative pragmatics,” can be summed up as answering the “wh” questions, the “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” and “why” of vocal performance. This chapter shows that songbirds and infants have to (a) learn how to use their signals though social modeling and social operant learning and (b) learn to lengthen their attention span so as to be able to acquire critical feedback from social companions. Of particular importance is the convergence of directed attention and vocalizations because individuals are able to receive both vocal and visual feedback to their behaviors.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of Attitudinal Language Employed by English and Persian Writers in Academic Writing
Academic writing might incorporate evaluative strategies with the aim of construing and registering attitudinal positionings of writers towards other people, objects, and state of affairs included in the texts, and has been the area of investigation from different perspectives. One of these perspectives has been the way that determines attitudinal assessments in the rhetorical formation of text...
متن کاملWhy metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics
Metaphors are powerful communicative tools because they produce ‘framing effects’. These effects are especially palpable when the metaphor is an insult that denigrates the hearer or someone he cares about. In such cases, just comprehending the metaphor produces a kind of ‘complicity’ that cannot easily be undone by denying the speaker’s claim. Several theorists have taken this to show that meta...
متن کاملA Pragmatic and Semantic Unified Framework for Agent Communication
In this thesis, we propose a unified framework for the pragmatics and the semantics of agent communication. Pragmatics deals with the way agents use communicative acts when conversing. It is related to the dynamics of agent interactions and to the way of connecting individual acts while building complete conversations. Semantics is interested in the meaning of these acts. It lays down the found...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Dialogistic Language Employed by English and Persian Writers in Academic Writing
Academic writing is typically encoded by relatively negotiable and arguable resources indicating the potentially dialogistic nature of its discourse community, and has been the area of investigation from different perspectives. One of these perspectives has been the way that determines dialogistic resources in the rhetorical formation of textbooks. Thus, this study is conducted to explore and e...
متن کامل“Agent A, Can You Pass the Salt?” The Role of Pragmatics in Agent Communication
Developers of current agent communication languages (ACLs) have exploited the parallels between agent communication and human communication in developing the syntax and semantics of their languages. In this paper we extend the comparison of agent communication language to natural language by proposing an ACL pragmatics. Just as in natural language, the pragmatics of an ACL is the relationship b...
متن کامل